Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (31W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition +380%
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Sep 2009
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
3
Compute Units
-
120
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy