Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM +42%
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Apr 2009
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
120
Shading Units
96
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy