Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
24 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 69W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (54.40GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240 +52%
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Nov 2009
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
120
Shading Units
96
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy