Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
8 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM +116%
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jul 2009
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
120
Shading Units
112
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
120W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy