Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +1676%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Apr 2019
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
120
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy