Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +219%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
120
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy