Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295 +254%
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
120
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy