Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 +1834%
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Mar 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
195W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy