Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +2030%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy