Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 +986%
1.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy