Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition +61%
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2011
Radeon R600
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy