Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7600 +11798%
19.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2440 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.2 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.98 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
624.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 33
-
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy