Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM +379%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy