Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +7435%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy