Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (185W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +1879%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Feb 2021
Radeon R600
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
320
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
185W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
TU106
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy