Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 340 OEM +25%
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Oland
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy