Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs ATI FireGL V8650

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XTX +8%
0.476 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2007
Radeon R600
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

240W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
R600
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy