Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 X3 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3 's Advantages
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (145W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 3850 X3
0.428 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +25%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
320
Shading Units
216
16
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.70 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
10.70 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
428.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

145W
TDP
171W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GT200B
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy