Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs AMD FirePro A300

ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 4200 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4200 IGP
0.04 TFLOPS
FirePro A300 +1637%
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
TeraScale IGP
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
760 MHz
-
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

2
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

RS880
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
-
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
32 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy