Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP

ATI Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 4250 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1400MHz
280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250 IGP
0.044 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 320SP +1936%
0.896 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2010
Release Date
Jan 2020
TeraScale IGP
Generation
Renoir
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

2
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
2.240 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.792 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
896.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
56.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
15W
-
-
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

RS880
GPU Name
Renoir
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.1
-
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
9.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy