Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD FirePro W4300

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +2875%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Dec 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
12
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Bonaire
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy