Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD FirePro W8000

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +6620%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy