CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
ATI Radeon HD 4750
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4750 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 4750 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
424 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4750
+74%
0.934 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4750
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Sep 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
640
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
23.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
934.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
186.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV740
GPU Name
GT200
RV740 PRO
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.826 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
137 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
2
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
3
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA P104 100
4
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
5
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs AMD Radeon RX 455 OEM
6
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM
7
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
8
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2
9
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
10
ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Related News
1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy