Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4750 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4750 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
424 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4750 +74%
0.934 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
640
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
23.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
934.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
186.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV740
GPU Name
GT200
RV740 PRO
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.826 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
137 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy