Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6625M vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon HD 6625M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6625M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6625M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 26W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6625M +80%
0.432 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Oct 2010
Vancouver
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
160
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
10.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

26W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Whistler
GPU Name
Seymour
Whistler LP
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy