Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Boost and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Boost +432%
3.315 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2010
Southern Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1792
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
103.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.315 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
828.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
219W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G92B
Tahiti PRO2 (215-0821282)
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy