Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +100%
2.867 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2015
Southern Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Bonaire
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy