Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 +2826%
1.229 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
Southern Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1229 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
307.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV610
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy