Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 +631%
1.229 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Feb 2008
Southern Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1229 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
307.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV630
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy