Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI100 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI100 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1502MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7648 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI100 +28737%
23.07 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1502 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

120
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
7680
Shading Units
32
480
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
721.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
184.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
11.54 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arcturus
GPU Name
G84
Arcturus XL
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
CDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
25.6 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
750 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy