Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1700MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 80GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1935GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +132%
45.26 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
80GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
1935GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
208
Compute Units
-
13312
Shading Units
6912
832
TMUs
432
0
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA100
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy