Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
13120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +13783%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
13312
Shading Units
192
832
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK107
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy