Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
13304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +238110%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 450
0.019 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
13312
Shading Units
8
832
TMUs
4
0
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.920 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.920 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.20 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G98
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy