Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40st

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40st

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40st to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
10432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K40st 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +1266%
45.26 TFLOPS
Tesla K40st
3.312 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
13312
Shading Units
2880
832
TMUs
240
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.50 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.312 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1104 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
245W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK110B
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy