Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +3297%
45.26 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
13312
Shading Units
512
832
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GF110
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy