CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
VS
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 140M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
14064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+184015%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 140M
0.026 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X
VS
Quadro NVS 140M
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
16
880
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
G86
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
G86-740-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
127 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
10W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
2
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M
3
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA H100 PCIe
4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
5
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe
6
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
7
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
8
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
9
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
10
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy