AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1700MHz vs 1687MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
11520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+454%
47.87 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
8.637 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1215 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
14080
Shading Units
2560
880
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
95W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA107
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
