Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 74% (1650MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (85W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +24%
4.224 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Nov 2012
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy