CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+39%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
FirePro S9300 X2
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
64
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
2
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
3
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 3470
4
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5
ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
6
AMD Radeon RX 550 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
7
AMD Radeon HD 7970 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
8
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon HD 6610
9
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
10
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1
Related News
1
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
2
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
3
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
4
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
5
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
6
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
7
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
8
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
9
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
10
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy