Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +39%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
64
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy