CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FireStream 9170
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FireStream 9170
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+1052%
5.728 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
FireStream 9170
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
4
2304
Shading Units
320
144
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV670
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
2
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
3
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
4
ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 3470
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
8
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
9
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
10
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy