Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
2296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +25936%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2304
Shading Units
8
144
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
G98
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
G98-400-U2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy