Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 435 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +872%
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 435 OEM
0.589 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jun 2016
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
320
144
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.360 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.40 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
588.8 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Oland
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy