CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA RTX A400
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA RTX A400
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+111%
5.728 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
RTX A400
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
6
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GA107
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
3
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 560DX
4
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
5
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
6
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
7
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 5490
8
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
9
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
10
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy