Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2144 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +433%
10.75 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2010
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
1440
224
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Cypress
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy