Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1600MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V520
7.373 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +71%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2020
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon Pro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
2048bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
2304
Shading Units
4480
144
TMUs
280
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
14.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
7.373 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
460.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 12
GPU Name
GA100
Navi 12
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.5
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy