Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (2200MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V620 +60%
20.28 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon Pro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
70
72
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
4480
288
TMUs
280
128
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GA100
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
7 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.5
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy