Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs ATI FireGL V8600

AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 28GB VRAM Radeon PRO V710 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO V710 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (28GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (158W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO V710 +6184%
27.65 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

28GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
224bit
Memory Bus
512bit
504.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

54
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
3456
Shading Units
320
216
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
54
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
54 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

192.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
432.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
55.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
27.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
864.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

158W
TDP
159W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
R600
Navi 32
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy