Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 102% (1880MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 205W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5700 +809%
8.663 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Dec 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1400 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1880 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
8
2304
Shading Units
512
144
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

120.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
270.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
17.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.663 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
541.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

205W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy