Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +484%
3.133 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
448bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
768
Shading Units
216
48
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 24
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy