Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +123%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy