Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +1470%
3.58 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
20
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
143W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
G80
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy